Gj. Lane et al., SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL VERSUS UNILATERAL TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - OUTCOMES ANALYSIS, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (345), 1997, pp. 106-112
One hundred consecutive, primary simultaneous bilateral total knee art
hroplasties were prospectively compared with 100 consecutive, primary
unilateral total knee arthroplasties in reference to relative risk, co
mplications, cost, and need for rehabilitation. All procedures were pe
rformed using identical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperativ
e protocols. Postoperative confusion was approximately four times grea
ter in the simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties group (29%
versus 7%), which was thought to represent an increased incidence of
fat embolism. Cardiopulmonary complications were approximately three t
imes greater after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties (1
4% versus 5%), and most commonly involved arrhythmias. The increased s
tress on the cardiopulmonary system with simultaneous bilateral total
knee arthroplasties may make this procedure contraindicated in certain
patients with preexisting disease. There was an approximately 17 time
s greater need for banked blood in the simultaneous bilateral total kn
ee arthroplasties group (17% versus 1%), which is alarming given the p
ersistent concerns of transfusion related disease transmission. Althou
gh the length of hospitalization was similar (6.4 days simultaneous bi
lateral total knee arthroplasties versus 6 days unilateral total knee
arthroplasty), 89% of the patients in the simultaneous bilateral total
knee arthroplasties group required a rehabilitation stay versus 45% o
f the patients in the unilateral total knee arthroplasty group. Total
hospital charges averaged $53,168 for simultaneous bilateral total kne
e arthroplasties versus $32,598 for unilateral total knee arthroplasty
, Total rehabilitation charges were similar. The relative cost savings
implicit by doing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties se
em to be at least partially offset by the approximately two times grea
ter need for rehabilitation in this group. The true safety, efficacy,
relative risk, and total cost analysis of simultaneous bilateral total
knee arthroplasties demands further critical evaluation.