A comparative study of arbitrarily programmable, but fixed-rate videop
hone codecs using quarter common intermediate format (QCIF) video sequ
ences scanned at 10 frames/s is offered. In contrast to existing and f
orthcoming standard schemes, such as the H.261, H.263 and MPEG2, MPEG4
codecs, which rely on bandwidth-efficient but error-sensitive variabl
e-length coding techniques combined with a complex self-descriptive bi
tstream structure, the proposed codecs exhibit a more robust, regular
bitstream and a constant bitrate. Clearly, their philosophy is differe
nt from the above error-sensitive and variable-rare standard schemes,
since these constant-rate codecs were designed to allow direct replace
ment of mobile radio voice codecs in second generation wireless system
s, such as the Pan-European GSM, the American IS-54 and IS-95 as well
as the Japanese systems, operating at 13, 8, 9.6 and 6.7 kbit/s, respe
ctively. This philosophy can, however, be adopted to higher-rate syste
ms, such as the Digital European Cordless Telecommunications (DECT) an
d the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS). The Type 1 co
decs proposed benefit from invoking sophisticated compression techniqu
es in order to achieve best video quality at a given bitrate. In contr
ast, the Type 2 schemes introduced maximise the codecs' error resilien
ce at the cost of slightly reduced video quality under error-free cond
itions. Gain-cost quantised, fixed but arbitrarily programmable rate d
iscrete cosine transformed (DCT) video codecs, vector-quantised (VQ) a
nd quad-tree (QT) coded algorithms are proposed and their video qualit
y, complexity, compression ratio and error resilience trade-offs are c
omparatively analysed under identical conditions. Finally, our candida
te codecs are compared to the standard H261, H.263 and MPEG2 benchmark
codecs.