Gm. Clark et al., MITOSIN (A NEW PROLIFERATION MARKER) CORRELATES WITH CLINICAL OUTCOMEIN NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER, Cancer research, 57(24), 1997, pp. 5505-5508
Tumor proliferation rate is an important prognostic factor in breast c
ancer, and S-phase fraction (SPF), as measured by flow cytometry, is t
he most clinically validated of several methods for measuring it. Howe
ver, flow cytometry is not web suited to evaluating the formalin-fixed
, paraffin-embedded tumors that are routinely available or to the incr
easing number of small breast cancers. These and other limitations hav
e motivated research into alternative methods for measuring proliferat
ion, including immunohistochemistry (THC) against cell cycle-related a
ntigens, which are better suited for the evaluation of small archival
tissue samples. Mitosin is a recently described 350 kD nuclear phospho
protein that is expressed in the late G(1), S, G(2), and M phases of t
he cell cycle but not in G(0). Using a new monoclonal antibody (14C10)
, this pilot study evaluated mitosin expression by IHC in a series of
386 node-negative, formalin-fixed, archival breast cancers and correla
ted the results with several prognostic factors and clinical outcome (
median follow-up, 78 months; range 3-214 months). The median and range
of mitosin positive cells were 7% and 1-47%, respectively. There was
a strong positive correlation between mitosin and SPF (r = 0.57; P = 0
.0001), and there were significant negative correlations with estrogen
receptor, progesterone receptor, and patient age. Mitosin was not rel
ated to overall survival in this pilot study. However, in a univariate
cutpoint analysis of disease-free survival (DFS), patients with high
levels of mitosin (>9% positive cells) had significantly worse DFS tha
n did patients with lower levels (68% versus 84% at 5 years, respectiv
ely). In a multivariate analysis of DFS, large tumor size (>2 cm) and
high mitosin were the only independently significant predictors of rec
urrence (relative risks = 2.47 and 1.72, respectively) in a model cont
aining the additional factors estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor
, patient age, and SPF. These preliminary results suggest that mitosin
as assessed by IHC may be superior to SPF as a prognostic factor in n
ode-negative breast cancer, but additional studies are necessary to va
lidate these promising findings.