Background-Eradication of Helicobacter pylori cures and prevents the r
elapse of duodenal ulceration and also results in histological resolut
ion of chronic active gastritis. Aim-To compare four treatment regimen
s lasting seven days of a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics in
the eradication of H. pylori. Patients-Men or women with H pylori pos
itive duodenal ulceration or gastritis, or both. Methods-A single blin
d, prospectively randomised, parallel group, comparative, multicentre
study. After a positive CLO test, patients underwent histology, H pylo
ri culture, and a C-13 urea breath test to confirm H pylori status. Tr
eatment with one of four regimens: LAC, LAM, LCM, or OAM, where L is 3
0 mg of lansoprazole twice daily, A is 1 g of amoxycillin twice daily,
M is 400 mg of metronidazole twice daily, C is 250 mg of clarithromyc
in twice daily, and O is 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily, was assigned
randomly. A follow up breath test was done at least 28 days after com
pleting treatment. Results-H pylori eradication (intention to treat) w
as 104/121 (86.0%) with LAC, 87/131 (66.4%) with LAM, 103/118 (87.3%)
with LCM, and 94/126 (74.6%) with OAM. There was a significant differe
nce (p < 0.001) in the proportion of patients in whom eradication was
successful between LAC and LCM when compared with LAM, but no signific
ant difference (p = 0.15) between LAM and OAM. Metronidazole resistanc
e before treatment was identified as a significant prognostic factor w
ith regard to eradication of H pylori. The regimens which contained me
tronidazole were significantly less effective than those without metro
nidazole in the presence of pretreatment resistant H pylori. There was
no difference among the treatment groups with regard to the incidence
and severity of adverse events reported. Conclusions-All four treatme
nt regimens were safe and effective in eradicating H pylori in the pat
ient population studied. LAC was the most efficacious treatment in pat
ients with pretreatment metronidazole resistant H pylori, and was sign
ificantly better than LAM and OAM in this group of patients.