Estimates of the effects of alternative discrete irrigation water sche
duling options on consumptive use or evapotranspiration and on crop yi
eld are developed for a northeastern Colorado case study. The analysis
proceeds from the premise that farmers, rather than considering irrig
ation water as a continuously variable input, tend to treat irrigation
s as discrete events, and make scheduling decisions as choices among n
umbers of irrigations of approximately equal volume. The van Genuchten
-Hanks model is employed to develop a transient-state water-crop produ
ction function model. Results for two crops-corn grain and edible dry
beans-are presented here. Findings are that the effect of the number o
f irrigations on evapotranspiration and yield per hectare varies widel
y, depending upon the timing of applications. When farmers can choose
the optimal timing of irrigations, a reduced number of irrigations has
a relatively limited adverse effect on crop production until irrigati
ons are reduced to less than four per season. However, there are many
situations in which an inability to apply water can result in a very l
arge reduction from potential maximum yield, particularly if water is
withheld early in the season and/or during the rapid growth period of
the crops. In many contexts of irrigation water management, water poli
cy analysts will wish to consider the more realistic discrete-input si
mulation model for policy evaluation.