Pw. Ngan et al., MASTICATORY MUSCLE PAIN BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER TREATMENT WITH ORTHOPEDIC PROTRACTION HEADGEAR - A PILOT-STUDY, The Angle orthodontist, 67(6), 1997, pp. 433-437
Protraction headgear has been used in conjunction with a palatal expan
sion appliance to correct Class III malocclusion with maxillary defici
ency and/or mandibular prognathism. In general, 800 gm of orthopedic f
orce is used to protract the maxilla, and 75% of this force is transmi
tted to the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area via the mandible. The e
ffect of this heavy intermittent force on the TMJ has not been reporte
d in the literature. The objectives of this study were to determine th
e level of masticatory muscle pain and EMG activity in patients treate
d with maxillary protraction headgear. Ten patients with skeletal Clas
s III malocclusion whose treatment plan called for maxillary protracti
on headgear treatment participated in this study. Nocturnal masticator
y muscle activity was determined using a portable electromyographic (E
MG) recording device. Subjects wore the EMG device 14 nights before tr
eatment, 14 nights during treatment, and 14 nights 1 month after activ
e treatment. Masticatory muscle pain level was determined by muscle pa
lpation, scored on a scale of 0 to 3 each period, according to the met
hod of Gross and Gale. The examiner followed a sequence outlined by Bu
rch to examine the masticatory muscles. Results showed no significant
differences for masticatory muscle activities before, during, and afte
r treatment. Only a few patients experienced level 1 masticatory pain
during treatment. None of the patients experienced masticatory muscle
pain 1 month after treatment. These results demonstrate no significant
increase in masticatory muscle activity or muscle pain associated wit
h orthopedic treatment using maxillary protraction headgear.