Gb. Kletter et al., ACUTE EFFECTS OF ESTRADIOL INFUSION AND NALOXONE ON LUTEINIZING-HORMONE SECRETION IN PUBERTAL BOYS, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 82(12), 1997, pp. 4010-4014
We have shown previously in pubertal boys that testosterone (T) suppre
sses the nocturnal augmentation of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion
principally by decreasing LH pulse frequency. As T can be aromatised t
o estradiol (E-2), and E-2 effects on LH secretory dynamics may be sep
arate from those of T, we examined the effects of acute E-2 infusion o
n LH secretion in pubertal boys. Opioid receptor blockade has been rep
orted to increase LH secretion after estradiol suppression in adult me
n, so we also examined whether naloxone might augment LH secretion dur
ing E-2 treatment in pubertal boys. Starting at 1000 h, eight pubertal
boys were given a 33 h saline infusion, followed 1 week later by an E
-2 infusion at 4.6 nmol/m(2)/h. During both infusions, four iv boluses
of saline were given hourly beginning at 1200 h on the first day, and
four naloxone iv boluses, 0.1 mg/kg each, were given hourly beginning
at 1200 h on the second day. Blood was obtained every 15 min for LH,
and every 60 min for T and E-2, from 1200 h until the end of the infus
ion. Pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)
was assessed after both infusions by iv administration of 250 ng/kg s
ynthetic GnRH. Estradiol infusion increased the mean plasma E-2 concen
tration from 23 +/- 4 to 46 +/- 6 pmol/L (P < 0.01) and suppressed mea
n plasma T from 4.9 +/- 1.4 to 3.0 +/- 3.5 nmol/L (saline vs. E-2 infu
sion, P < 0.05). The overall mean LH was suppressed by E-2 infusion fr
om 3.7 +/- 0.5 to 2.2 +/- 0.4 IU/L (saline vs. E-2 infusion, P < 0.01)
. LH pulse frequency was suppressed by 50%, whereas mean LH pulse ampl
itude was not different between saline and E-2 infusions. Administrati
on of naloxone did not alter the mean LH, LH pulse frequency, or ampli
tude during either saline or E-2 infusions. Pituitary responsiveness t
o exogenous GnRH was similar during both infusions. These studies indi
cate that E-2 produces its negative feedback in pubertal boys principa
lly by suppression of LH pulse frequency, and naloxone does not revers
e these suppressive effects. Thus E-2 suppression of LH secretion is m
ediated by a decrease of hypothalamic GnRH secretion that is independe
nt of endogenous opioid pathways.