The increasing agricultural reuse of treated effluent serves goals suc
h as promoting sustainable agriculture, preserving scarce water resour
ces, and maintaining environmental quality. Also, irrigating with wast
ewater may reduce purification levels and fertilization costs, because
soil and crops serve as bio-filters. and wastewater contain nutrients
. Policy decisions regarding the level of purification and location of
agriculture using wastewater, should consider multifarious aspects in
cluding costs, hazards and benefits of agricultural reuse of wastewate
r. The present paper demonstrates, in a simple way, how to tackle deci
sion-making questions regarding the disposal of wastewater from an eco
nomic standpoint. It compares various wastewater reclamation and reuse
options such as treatment levers and location of reuse, by computing
the net national benefit as applied to a specific case study in centra
l Israel. Several alternatives were compared including river disposal.
local agricultural reuse of wastewater, and conveyance to the south.
Estimated costs include those of treatment, storage and conveyance, wh
ile benefits comprise the value of agricultural output, the decrease i
n fertilization costs, and aquifer recharge. Hazard costs estimated in
this analysis relate to seepage of nitrogen and health risks. Accordi
ng to this analysis, wastewater irrigation in the center of Israel sav
es US$0.50-0.60/m(3) compared with river disposal, and US$0.10-0.20/m(
3) compared with conveyance to the south. Conveyance to the south of t
ertiary-treated effluent (as in the Dan Region Treatment Plant) instea
d of discard saves US$0.12/m(3), justifying a subsidy. (C) 1997 Elsevi
er Science B.V.