H. Rickli et al., LIMITS OF REVASCULARIZATION - INTERVENTIO NAL TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR OCCLUSIONS AND RESTENOSIS AFTER BYPASS-SURGERY, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift, 127(50), 1997, pp. 2091-2097
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may be limited by incomple
te revascularization, graft failure and progression of narrowing in th
e native coronary arteries. Ischemia in the first year after CABG, ass
ociated with anastomotic problems, can be safely and effectively treat
ed with angioplasty. The rate of saphenous vein graft failure increase
s rapidly 8 years after CABG. Interventional strategy depends largely
on lesion morphology. Focal stenoses can be treated with stents, with
primary success rates > 90% and complication rates < 5%. Diffusely deg
enerated vein grafts and chronic total occlusions remain problematic f
or all catheter-based interventions. No randomized trial exists compar
ing reoperative CABG with angioplasty. In non-randomized data, neither
therapy was clearly superior to the other. The underlying extent of d
isease primarily determines long-term survival. This suggests that con
trol of risk factors may well be beneficial. In patients with recurren
t symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy, referral for revasculariza
tion is reasonable. The choice of additional treatment may be made on
the basis of clinical criteria and angiographic suitability, as well a
s patient preference.