Historically, additions to public infrastructure necessitated by urban
growth have been financed under a cost-sharing approach. In the last
several decades, however, financing of growth has increasingly relied
on land-use exactions, where new residents pay for the cost of increme
ntal infrastructure. Despite the emergence of a formal growth-control
literature, there has been virtually no formal analysis of the connect
ion between infrastructure financing and urban development. To provide
such an analysis, this paper investigates three different schemes for
financing incremental infrastructure within an urban growth model. Th
e analysis compares an impact-fee scheme to two types of cost-sharing
schemes, deriving the effects on urban growth and land values of switc
hing to the impact-fee scheme. The efficient financing scheme is also
identified. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science S.A.