Blomqvist and Johansson (1996) criticize my results regarding Besley's
(Besley, 1989) analysis of public catastrophic coverage. They concede
that my analysis was correct under the assumptions I made, but they a
rgue that a more general model than Besley or I used might yield diffe
rent results. Unfortunately, Blomqvist and Johansson's analysis of the
more general case is flawed. Whereas they claim to have provided a mo
re general argument against the sort of public intervention Besley pro
posed, they have unwittingly discovered an example in which his origin
al conjecture holds. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science S.A.