Stereoscopic depth analysis by means of disparity estimation has been
a classical topic of computer vision, from the biological models of st
ereopsis [1] to the widely used techniques based on correlation or sum
of squared differences [2]. Most of the recent work on this topic has
been devoted to the phase-based techniques, developed because of thei
r superior performance and better theoretical grounding [3, 4]. In thi
s article we characterize the performance of phase-based disparity est
imators, giving quantitative measures of their precision and their lim
its, and how changes in contrast, imbalance, and noise in the two ster
eo images modify the attainable accuracy. We find that the theoretical
range of measurable disparities, one period of the modulation of the
filter, is not attainable: the actual range is approx. two-thirds of t
his value. We show that the phase-based disparity estimators are robus
t to changes in contrast of 100% or more and well tolerate imbalances
of luminosity of 400% between the images composing the stereo pair. Cl
earing the Gabor filter of its DC component has been often advocated a
s a means to improve the accuracy of the results. We give a quantitati
ve measure of this improvement and show that using a DC-free Gabor fil
ter leads to disparity estimators nearly insensitive to contrast and i
mbalance. Our tests show that the most critical source of error is noi
se: the error increases linearly with the increase in noise level. We
conclude by studying the influence of the spectra and the luminosity o
f the input images on the error surface, for both artificial and natur
al images, showing that the spectral structure of the images has littl
e influence on the results, changing only the form of the error surfac
e near the limits of the detectable disparity range. In conclusion, th
is study allows estimation of the expected accuracy of custom-designed
phase-based stereo analyzers for a combination of the most common err
or sources.