Objective. To determine if mild renal pelvic dilatation at renal ultra
sound (RUS) is a reliable sign of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) at voidi
ng cystourethrogram (VCUG) in children. Materials nad methods. All pat
ients less than 10 years of age who had RUS and VCUG on the same day d
uring a 2-year period were identified in a computerized database. The
appearance of the collecting system of each kidney was classified into
two groups: group 0 - no dilatation (less than or equal to 2-mm anter
oposterior dia meter of the renal pelvis) and group 1 - 3 to 10-mm AP
diameter of the renal pelvis without caliectasis. VUR at VCUG was grad
ed using the International Reflux Study Committee system. Results. Fou
r hundred fifty-five patients (76 boys; 379 girls) with 910 kidneys we
re included. VUR occurred in 268 kidneys in 174 patients. There were 8
20 group 0 kidneys and 90 group 1 kidneys. Kidneys classified as group
1 (25.0 % had reflux) were no more likely to have reflux than were ki
dneys with nondistended (group 0) collecting systems (31.2 % had reflu
x). There was no statistical difference in the rate of reflux in patie
nts with group 1 renal pelvic distention (39.2 % refluxed) and a norma
l collecting system (33.3 % refluxed) (P = 0.365). Conclusion. The fre
quency of vesicoureteral reflux in children with mild renal pelvic dis
tention is not significantly different than in children with no disten
tion. Therefore, mild dilatation of the renal pelvis should not be con
sidered an indication for voiding cystourethrography.