ADVANCED DIFFUSE LARGE-CELL LYMPHOMA TREATED WITH 12-WEEK COMBINATIONCHEMOTHERAPY - NATURAL-HISTORY OF RELAPSE AFTER INITIAL COMPLETE RESPONSE AND PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES DEFINING OUTCOME AFTER RELAPSE
Pj. Hoskins et al., ADVANCED DIFFUSE LARGE-CELL LYMPHOMA TREATED WITH 12-WEEK COMBINATIONCHEMOTHERAPY - NATURAL-HISTORY OF RELAPSE AFTER INITIAL COMPLETE RESPONSE AND PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES DEFINING OUTCOME AFTER RELAPSE, Annals of oncology, 8(11), 1997, pp. 1125-1132
Purpose. To define both the natural history of and prognostic factors
affecting outcome post relapse from a complete response in advanced st
age diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods: A total of 468
patients aged 17-74 years received the 12-week duration chemotherapy r
egimens MACOP-B, VACOP-B and ACOP-12 between 1 April 1981 and 31 Decem
ber 1995 for advanced stage diffuse large, mixed or immunoblastic lymp
homa. Of these 402 entered a complete remission, 97 (24%) of whom subs
equently relapsed. Initial staging data, follow-up, and relapse inform
ation were analyzed to define the natural history of relapse and also
subjected to univariate and multivariate correlation with overall (OS)
and failure free survival (FFS). Results: Eleven percent of the relap
ses were low grade. All other relapses were of intermediate grade with
75% occurring within the first two years, the remainder up until the
eleventh year. Median and five-year OS from the time of relapse for in
termediate grade relapse were 12 months and 20%; for FFS they were eig
ht months and 18% respectively. Adverse independent factors, for both
OS and FFS were: less than one year to relapse, decreasing performance
status at relapse, and more than three nodal sites at relapse. Conclu
sions. Low-grade relapse is not uncommon in patients who initially pre
sented with diffuse large cell lymphoma. As the management of low-and
intermediate grade disease is so different biopsy proof of the nature
of the relapse is of value. The prognostic factors identified need to
be taken into consideration when analyzing results from trials of seco
ndary treatment so as to avoid erroneous conclusions about comparative
treatment efficacy.