H. Hjortswang et al., EVALUATION OF THE RFIPC, A DISEASE-SPECIFIC HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE, IN SWEDISH PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE-COLITIS, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 32(12), 1997, pp. 1235-1240
Background: We wanted to characterize a Swedish version of the Rating
Form of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient Concerns (RFIPC) with regar
d to validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Methods: Two hundred a
nd three consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis were studied. He
alth-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the disease-spe
cific questionnaire, the RFIPC, and a general questionnaire, the Sickn
ess Impact Profile (SIP). Concerns about general well-being were also
reported. Disease activity was measured by means of symptom cards, lab
oratory tests, and two clinical indices for disease activity. Results:
Test-retest reliability using Spearman's r (rs) was 0.79, and interna
l consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha was 0.95. RFIPC had a fai
r correlation with concerns about general well-being (rs = 0.69, P < 0
.001). There was also a stronger correlation with another measure of H
RQOL, the overall SIP score (rs = 0.43), than with measures of disease
activity such as stool frequency (rs = 0.28) and sigmoidoscopic gradi
ng (NS). The group of patients in relapse had a higher RFIPC sum score
than patients in remission (P = 0.001). Measures of HRQOL had a low c
orrelation with disease activity and did not respond to changes in dis
ease activity. Conclusion: The Swedish version of the RFIPC is a valid
and reliable measure of HRQOL. The SIP and the RFIPC have a good disc
riminative ability between groups of patients in remission and in rela
pse. However, they do not seem to be useful in predicting the disease
activity or change in disease activity over time in the individual pat
ient.