The beam-column method for the design of tieback walls is of intermedi
ate complexity between the pressure diagram methods and the finite-ele
ment method (FEM). A set of recommended P-y, F-w, and Q-w curves are p
resented for the soil model and the P-y path method is described to si
mulate properly the construction sequence of excavation and tieback st
ressing. The recommended beam-column method is evaluated by comparing
predictions with the measured behavior of four full-scale tieback wall
s in sand and in clay. The most influencing factors are identified thr
ough a parametric analysis and a comparison with four pressure diagram
methods is presented. The beam-column method is a deflection-based me
thod that satisfies the vertical, horizontal, and moment equilibrium o
f the wall. These significant and fundamental advantages over the pres
sure diagram methods make it a superior method, which should be used a
nytime the added complexity is warranted. The most severe limitation o
f the beam-column method is its inability to properly account for mass
phenomena, namely, mass movement and downdrag. The most useful aspect
of the beam-column method is its ability to give better bending momen
t profiles than the pressure diagram methods.