CCK RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS IN ANIMAL-MODELS OF ANXIETY - COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPLORATION TESTS, CONFLICT PROCEDURES AND A MODEL-BASED ON DEFENSIVE BEHAVIORS
G. Griebel et al., CCK RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS IN ANIMAL-MODELS OF ANXIETY - COMPARISON BETWEEN EXPLORATION TESTS, CONFLICT PROCEDURES AND A MODEL-BASED ON DEFENSIVE BEHAVIORS, Behavioural pharmacology, 8(6-7), 1997, pp. 549-560
The present experiments compared the behavioural effects of one cholec
ystokinin(A) (CCKA; lorglumide) and two CCKB (PD 135,158 and LY 288513
) receptor antagonists in classical animal models of anxiety, includin
g conflict tests (punished lever pressing and Vogel drinking tests in
rats) and exploratory models (elevated plus-maze test in rats and ligh
t/dark choice test in mice), and a recently developed mouse defence te
st battery (MDTB) which has been validated for the screening of both a
nti-panic and classical anxiolytic (i.e. benzodiazepines) drugs. Diaze
pam was used as a positive control. Results showed that all three CCK
receptor antagonists were inactive in both conflict tests. Furthermore
, despite the incorporation of more ethologically-derived measures (i.
e. risk assessment activities or directed exploration, or both) no eff
ects were observed in the elevated plus-maze and in the light/dark tes
ts. These profiles contrast with that of diazepam which displayed clea
r anxiolytic-like effects in these models. In the MDTB, the CCK recept
or antagonists failed to modify parameters (i.e. risk assessment, defe
nsive threat/attack and escape attempts), which have been shown to be
particularly sensitive to drugs effective in the treatment of generali
zed anxiety. By contrast, the CCKB receptor antagonists PD 135,158 (0.
001-0.01, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and LY 288513 (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.) significa
ntly decreased avoidance distance when the rat was first placed in the
test apparatus, an effect which is consistent with an anti-panic-like
action. Overall, these findings support the idea that classical anima
l models of anxiety may not be suitable for evaluation of the behaviou
ral effects of CCK receptor antagonists, whereas tests which may model
certain aspects of human panic such as the MDTB appear to be more rel
iable tools when screening such compounds.