Ms. Lipsky et Ca. Taylor, THE OPINIONS AND EXPERIENCES OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS REGARDING DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING, Journal of family practice, 45(6), 1997, pp. 495-499
BACKGROUND. The use of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) by pharma
ceutical companies is increasing. Our study examines the opinions and
experiences of family physicians concerning DTCA. METHODS. A survey in
strument designed to elicit the opinions, experiences, and perceptions
of family physicians about DTCA was sent to a 2% (N = 880) systematic
sampling of active physician members of the American Academy of Famil
y Physicians. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses wi
th t tests and chi(2) tests for independence used to examine subgroup
response differences. RESULTS. Four hundred fifty-four (52%) physician
s responded to the survey. Most physicians (95%) had encountered DTCA
personally, and had been approached by an average of 7 patients over t
he previous 6 months with requests for specific prescription drugs. Pr
escription antihistamines and antihypertensive drugs were the most com
monly requested. Overall, 80% of the physician respondents believed th
at print DTCA was not a good idea, while 84% expressed negative feelin
gs about television and radio advertising. Both groups cited ''mislead
ing biased view'' and ''increased costs'' as the most common disadvant
ages. Some reported benefits included ''better informed patients'' and
''promoting physician-patient communication.'' CONCLUSIONS. Overall,
the study group physicians had negative feelings about DTCA in both pr
int and electronic media. Studies directly examining patient perspecti
ves, as well-as cost benefits, are necessary to test the validity of t
he physicians' perceptions about DTCA.