Objective: To assess the use of remote telemedicine ophthalmology in p
atients presenting to an emergency department with acute eye problems.
Design: A prospective review from 1 December 1996 to 28 February 1997
of referral patterns and telemedicine consultations, comparing referr
al patterns with the same period one year before. Participants and set
ting: 24 patients presenting to the emergency department of a remote b
ase hospital in Queensland with an acute ophthalmological problem requ
iring a specialist opinion. Main outcome measures: Clinical outcomes;
use of the Patient Transit Scheme for isolated patients; acceptability
to patients and doctors; and ophthalmologists' opinions of the system
. Results: No adverse outcomes were identified. Patients transferred f
or urgent assessment fell from 17 for the corresponding period in the
previous year to four during the study period, while respective number
s of patients requiring non-urgent transfers (for surgery or postopera
tive review) during the same periods were 41 and 30. Both patients and
staff (including the ophthalmologists) found the telemedicine facilit
y very acceptable. Conclusion: Ophthalmology is well suited to telemed
icine for the diagnosis and management of acute conditions and postope
rative assessment of patients in remote areas. It offers considerable
potential benefits to patients, and enhances the skills of local pract
itioners.