CONFIDENTIAL INQUIRY INTO FAMILIES WITH 2 SIBLINGS WITH CYSTIC-FIBROSIS

Citation
B. Lane et al., CONFIDENTIAL INQUIRY INTO FAMILIES WITH 2 SIBLINGS WITH CYSTIC-FIBROSIS, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 77(6), 1997, pp. 501-503
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
ISSN journal
00039888
Volume
77
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
501 - 503
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9888(1997)77:6<501:CIIFW2>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objective-To audit the care that had been provided to couples before t he birth of a child with cystic fibrosis where a sibling had been prev iously diagnosed. Design-Retrospective review of case notes. Sample-Fa milies where at least one affected child had been born between 1 Janua ry 1991 and 30 June 1995 and the diagnosis in the first child was made before the second affected pregnancy reached 20 weeks. The combinatio n of information on these families with data from the prenatal diagnos is register allowed the reconstruction of a cohort of pregnancies in w omen with a previous affected child. Main results-Forty six eligible f amilies with a second affected child were identified. Details from the paediatrician who had diagnosed the first affected child were obtaine d in 43 cases: all 43 couples were offered genetic counselling, but wh ere provided by a paediatrician this was difficult to assess as no cou ple was sent a summary letter. Details were obtained from the obstetri cian in the subsequent affected pregnancy in 42 cases: prenatal diagno sis was not offered in 10 (24%), offered and declined in 24 (57%), off ered and accepted but termination declined in eight (19%). In the over all cohort of at risk pregnancies, the estimated rate of prenatal diag nosis offer was 97%, prenatal diagnosis uptake 86%, false negative pre natal diagnosis rate 0%, and uptake of termination 95%. Conclusions-(1 ) Parental choice was an important determinant of second affected birt hs. (2) Despite widespread availability, prenatal diagnosis was not of fered in an estimated 3% of at risk pregnancies. (3) There were shortc omings in counselling documentation, in particular failure to send a s ummary letter to counselled couples.