Pm. Upton et al., EVALUATION OF VIDEO IMAGING PREDICTION IN COMBINED MAXILLARY AND MANDIBULAR ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 112(6), 1997, pp. 656-665
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the soft tis
sue profile ''line drawings'' predicted by Quick Ceph Image in combine
d maxillary and mandibular orthognathic surgical procedures. Preoperat
ive (mean = 27.7 days presurgical) and posttreatment (mean = 11.5 mont
hs postsurgical) lateral cephalograms of 40 white patients (10 males a
nd 30 females) who had completed treatment that involved orthodontics,
one-piece LeFort I osteotomy, and mandibular advancement by bilateral
sagittal split osteotomy with or without genioplasty were used in the
study. Forty-five lateral hard and soft tissue landmarks were digitiz
ed, using the ''on-screen'' digitizing option, for each cephalogram an
d for each computer predicted posttreatment tracing. A customized anal
ysis consisting of 24 linear and 4 angular measurements was used to an
alyze the differences between the actual posttreatment cephalometric l
andmark measurements and computer predicted landmark measurements. Sta
tistically significant differences between the posttreatment cephalome
tric soft tissue profiles and the computer predicted soft tissue profi
les were analyzed for the total sample, patients grouped according to:
magnitude and direction of maxillary movements, adjunctive genioplast
y procedure, V-Y closure of the LeFort I incision, and gender and age
differences. The results indicated that for some of the soft tissue la
ndmarks, differences were found between the posttreatment and the comp
uter predicted profiles. Differences between the predicted and actual
posttreatment soft tissue profiles may be attributed to the inaccuracy
of Quick Ceph Image's default soft to hard tissue ratios when predict
ing the soft tissue response to combined maxillary and mandibular orth
ognathic surgical procedures.