Di. Rosenthal et al., COMPUTER-BASED SPEECH RECOGNITION AS A REPLACEMENT FOR MEDICAL TRANSCRIPTION, American journal of roentgenology, 170(1), 1998, pp. 23-25
OBJECTIVE, We have implemented computerized speech recognition in a hi
gh-volume clinical setting using a newly developed commercial software
system. This paper compares the performance of the computerized syste
m with conventional transcription during a trial week followed by 3 mo
nths of routine clinical use. CONCLUSION. The speech recognition syste
m was used for 97% of the cases during the trial week and 87% of cases
during the months of continuous use. For a similar mixture of cases,
no change occurred in the length of reports after introduction of the
computerized system. Speech recognition decreased the time until the r
eport became available by 99% and resulted in a substantial savings in
transcription costs. We conclude that speech recognition by computer
is practical in a high-volume clinical implementation.