REVISITING THE PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF GALLIUM SCINTIGRAPHY IN LOW-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA

Citation
A. Gallamini et al., REVISITING THE PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF GALLIUM SCINTIGRAPHY IN LOW-GRADE NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA, European journal of nuclear medicine, 24(12), 1997, pp. 1499-1506
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
03406997
Volume
24
Issue
12
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1499 - 1506
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-6997(1997)24:12<1499:RTPROG>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The purpose of this study was threefold: to evaluate the role of galli um-67 scintigraphy in the staging of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (LGNHL), to assess the relationship between the expression of CD71 on the surface of the neoplastic cells and the Ga-67 uptake by the tumou r, and to establish the contribution of Ga-67 scan in defining the pro gnosis of LGNHL. Forty-eight patients with untreated LGNHL diagnosed i n a single institution over a decade were reviewed, The end point of t he study was survival of the patients according to the scintigraphic G a-67 score at diagnosis. In addition to Ga-67 scan, other prognostic v ariables were studied, relating to the neoplastic burden, the biology of the tumour and the host. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used. Ga-67 scan identified only 116/286 (41%) nodes involved by lymph oma that were detected by clinical examination or computed tomography scan. A scintigraphic scoring system with an arbitrary cut-off value o f 3 (high scan score) was able to predict patients with a dismal progn osis: with a mean follow-up of 47 months (range: 1-146 months) the med ian survival time was 28 months in patients with a high scan score and 74 months in patients with a low scan score (P=0.002), CD71 values we re 27.4%+/-14.9% (mean +/-SD) in the former and 8.9%+/-7.2% in the lat ter (P=0.0001). Only performance status and extranodal sites were sign ificant variables for prognosis in multivariate analysis. It is conclu ded that Ga-67 scan is inaccurate in staging but might be very importa nt in defining the prognosis in LGNHL, in association with other progn ostic variables.