Ac. Viswanathan et al., EARLY DETECTION OF VISUAL-FIELD PROGRESSION IN GLAUCOMA - A COMPARISON OF PROGRESSOR AND STATPAC-2, British journal of ophthalmology, 81(12), 1997, pp. 1037-1042
Aim-To compare the performance of PROGRESSOR (pointwise linear regress
ion) and STATPAC 2 (comparison with baseline values) in detecting earl
y deterioration in the visual fields of glaucoma patients. Methods-Vis
ual field series from 19 untreated normal tension glaucoma eyes which
were deteriorating on clinical grounds were analysed by PROGRESSOR and
STATPAC 2. Progression criteria for PROGRESSOR were (I) inner points:
slope < -1 dB/year, p < 0.05 and (2) edge points: slope < -2 dB/year,
p < 0.05. Criteria for STATPAC 2 were p < 0.05 change probability for
any point on three consecutive fields. Detection time was defined as
the time interval between the initial field and the first field in whi
ch at least one progressing point was identified. Detection times prod
uced by the two techniques were compared. Results-PROGRESSOR and STATP
AC 2 agreed on progression in all 19 eyes. Mean detection time for PRO
GRESSOR was 1.077 (SD 0.985) years and for STATPAC 2 was 2.161 (1.357)
years. PROGRESSOR detected progression sooner than STATPAC 2 in 18 ey
es (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test). PROGRESSOR det
ected progression earlier by a mean of 1.085 (0.936) years. Conclusion
s-PROGRESSOR consistently detected progression earlier than STATPAC 2.
The PROGRESSOR software is a useful tool for the early detection of v
isual field deterioration in glaucoma.