We evaluated the relation between occupational exposure to diesel exha
ust and cancer of the lung in a meta-analysis of 29 published cohort a
nd case-control studies. Twenty-one of the 23 studies meeting the incl
usion criteria hail observed relative risk estimates greater than one.
Pooled effect measures weighted by study precision indicated an incre
ased relative risk (RR) for lung cancer from occupational exposure to
diesel exhaust [RR = 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.24-1.44].
Subanalysis of case-central (RR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.18-1.51) vs cohort st
udies (RR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.21-1.47) and of studies that controlled f
or smoking (RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.20-1.52) vs those that did not (RR =
1.33; 95% CI = 1.20-1.47) produced results that did not differ from t
hose of the overall analysis. On the other hand, cohort studies using
internal comparisons (RR = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.29-1.58) showed higher rel
ative risks than those using external comparisons (RR = 1.22; 95% CI =
1.04-1.44). Heterogeneity between studies was reduced when we stratif
ied studies by the occupational setting in which exposure occurred. A
positive duration-response relation was evident in those studies that
were stratified by employment duration. This meta-analysis supports a
causal association between increased risks for lung cancer and exposur
e to diesel exhaust.