We compare two simulation procedures used to determine empirical distr
ibutions of three affected sib-pair test-statistics in family samples
with missing parental marker information. P1 and P2 procedures differ
according to whether affected sibs' genotypes are ignored (P1) or acco
unted for (P2) to generate the unknown parental genotypes. Overall, ou
r results show that P2 procedure performs better than P1, particularly
when marker heterozygosity is high (H = 75%) or when marker data from
unaffected siblings are available with low marker heterozygosity (H =
50%). These results are similar for all affected sib-pair tests. (C)
1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.