Methodological issues have limited neuroimaging studies of cerebellar
structures. In this article we describe a method that addresses some o
f these limitations and phantom studies that examine the validity of t
he image manipulations. We compared volumes derived from 3D Spoiled Gr
adient Recalled Acquisition MR images sliced with respect to three dif
ferent alignment methods: one based on cerebellar landmarks, another o
n cerebral landmarks and a third on the plane of acquisition. Examinat
ion of coefficients of variation, coefficients of error and convergent
validity suggests that although regional cerebellar volumes based on
cerebellar landmarks provide the best estimates of the true volumes, o
bserved differences between volume measurements from alignments based
on cerebellar or cerebral landmarks were generally not significant and
were inconsequential. In this case, the measure was improved with ali
gnment along local, relevant cerebellar landmarks. A set of phantom ex
periments showed that realignment, reslicing and interpolation in 3-di
mensional image processing exerted, at most, trivial distortion on the
estimates of actual object volumes. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland
Ltd.