The concept of convergence of continued fraction type algorithms has b
een defined a number of times in the literature. We investigate the re
lation between these definitions, and show that they do not always coi
ncide. We relate the definitions to the question whether or not the na
tural partition of the underlying dynamical system is a generator. It
turns out that the 'right' definition of convergence is equivalent to
this partition being a generator. The second definition of convergence
is shown to be equivalent only under extra conditions on the transfor
mation. These extra conditions are typically found to be satisfied whe
n the second definition is used in the literature.