J. Scheidler et al., PARAMETRIAL INVASION IN CERVICAL-CARCINOMA - EVALUATION OF DETECTION AT MR-IMAGING WITH FAT-SUPPRESSION, Radiology, 206(1), 1998, pp. 125-129
PURPOSE: To evaluate detection of parametrial invasion at magnetic res
onance (MR) imaging with fat suppression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 35
patients with cancer of the cervix, MR imaging was performed with the
following sequences: T2-weighted turbo spin echo (SE), turbo short in
version time inversion recovery (STIR), and unenhanced or gadolinium-e
nhanced T1-weighted SE with and without excitation-spoiling fat suppre
ssion. Images obtained with each sequence were evaluated for parametri
al invasion by two blinded radiologists separately, who scored their l
evel of diagnostic confidence from 0 to 10 (no confidence to high conf
idence). Then, all images were evaluated together and findings were co
rrelated with histopathologic findings. RESULTS: No statistically sign
ificant differences were found between staging with T2-weighted turbo
SE, turbo STIR, and T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced SE
images. Staging with T1-weighted SE, T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced S
E, and T1-weighted fat-suppressed SE images was significantly worse (P
< .05). Diagnostic confidence was lower (P < .001) with T1-weighted g
adolinium-enhanced SE and T1-weighted fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanc
ed SE images (5.5 and 6.2 points, respectively) compared to staging wi
th T2-weighted turbo SE and turbo STIR images (8.2 and 7.6 points, res
pectively). No statistically significantly improvement in staging accu
racy was found when all images were evaluated together. Conclusion: In
MR diagnosis of parametrial invasion, the addition of fat-suppressed
or gadolinium-enhanced MR images did not improve the accuracy with T2-
weighted turbo SE images alone.