St. Kee et al., SUPERIOR VENA-CAVA SYNDROME - TREATMENT WITH CATHETER-DIRECTED THROMBOLYSIS AND ENDOVASCULAR STENT PLACEMENT, Radiology, 206(1), 1998, pp. 187-193
PURPOSE: To evaluate use of catheter-directed thrombolysis and/or endo
vascular stent placement to treat superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. M
ATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients with SVC syndrom
e were studied. The cause was underlying malignancy in 43 and benign d
isease included in 31 cases and stenosed in 28. Twenty-seven patients
underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis; 51 underwent endovascular st
ent placement. Patency was defined in terms of absence of symptoms and
signs of SVC syndrome. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 56
of 59 patients (95%). Among 42 patients with underlying malignancy (me
an follow-up, 7.0 months; range, 1-34 months), primary clinical patenc
y was achieved in 33 (79%) and secondary clinical patency was achieved
in 39 (93%). Among 13 patients with benign disease (mean follow-up, 1
7.0 months; range, 1-27 months), primary clinical patency was achieved
in 10 (77%) and secondary clinical patency was achieved in 11 (85%).
Four patients were lost to follow-up. Periprocedural mortality and mor
bidity rates were 3% (two of 59 patients) and 10% (six of 59 patients)
, respectively. CONCLUSION: Catheter-directed thrombolysis and endovas
cular stent placement is a safe and effective treatment of SVC syndrom
e.