Sw. Siegel et al., PELVIC FLOOR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF URGE AND MIXED URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN WOMEN, Urology, 50(6), 1997, pp. 934-940
Objectives. To determine the efficacy of daily or every-other-day elec
trical stimulation in treating detrusor instability (urge) or urge plu
s genuine stress (mixed) urinary incontinence in women, Methods. A mul
ticenter, prospective, nonrandomized study enrolled subjects with urge
and mixed urinary incontinence assigned to daily or every-other-day t
reatments (15 minutes twice daily) using pelvic floor stimulation, Out
come measures assessed were (1) leakage episodes, nocturnal episodes,
voiding frequency, total voids, and pad count, and (2) patient subject
ive assessment and quality of life, Results, Seventy-two subjects were
enrolled. Sixty-eight subjects completed the 20-week protocol: 33 tre
ated daily and 35 treated every other day. The entire study group (n =
68) experienced a significant decrease in total leaks (P<0.001), noct
urnal episodes (P = 0.001), pad count (P = 0.002), and total voids (P
= 0.003) and on visual analog scales. Sixty-nine percent (n = 46) of s
ubjects with urge or mixed incontinence were cured or improved by at l
east 50%, with 28% (n = 19) being cured. There were no significant dif
ferences between daily and every-other-day users. Nonresponse was corr
elated with number of previous therapies (P<0.001) and number of vagin
al deliveries (P = 0.007). Overall, subjects were 93% compliant with d
evice use, and 72% (n = 47) were satisfied with the therapy. Conclusio
ns. Twenty weeks of pelvic floor electrical stimulation therapy is eff
ective in treating urge and mixed urinary incontinence, regardless of
daily or every-other-day treatments. (C) 1997, Elsevier Science Inc. A
ll rights reserved.