Three-neutrino mixing schemes suggested-by Cardall & Fuller and Acker
& Pakvasa are compared and contrasted. Both of these schemes seek to s
olve the solar and atmospheric neutrino problems and to account for th
e possible neutrino oscillation signal in the LSND experiment. These n
eutrino oscillation schemes have different atmospheric and solar neutr
ino signatures that will be discriminated by Super-Kamiokande and SNO.
They will also have different signatures in proposed long-baseline ac
celerator and reactor experiments. In particular, both of these scheme
s would give dramatic (and dramatically different) signals in an ''int
ermediate baseline'' experiment, such as the proposed ICARUS detector
in the Jura mountains 17 km from CERN. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.