ANTIENDOTHELIAL CELL ANTIBODIES TO THE ENDOTHELIAL HYBRIDOMA CELL-LINE (EAHY926) IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES
Citation
J. Matsuda et al., ANTIENDOTHELIAL CELL ANTIBODIES TO THE ENDOTHELIAL HYBRIDOMA CELL-LINE (EAHY926) IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS-ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES, British Journal of Haematology, 97(1), 1997, pp. 227-232
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
SICI code
0007-1048(1997)97:1<227:ACATTE>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The endothelial hybridoma (EAhy926) cell line was employed to clarify
whether antiphospholipid antibodies (aPA) [lupus anticoagulant (LA), a
ntiprothrombin antibody (aPT) and/or anticardiolipin antibody (aCL)] a
nd antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECA) are identical, and establish
whether beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)-GPI) is needed for reactivity
of aPA to endothelial cells. Ig-G AECA was positive in 9/30 SLE patie
nts with aPA (30.0%) and 10/22 SLE patients negative for aPA (45.5%).
Ig-M AECA was positive in one SLE patient with aPA and one SLE patient
without aPA. AECA-positivity was not significantly different among un
fixed, TNF-stimulated and fixed EAhy926. The influence of beta(2)-GPI
on the reactivity of serum to EAhy926 was minimal, and absorption expe
riments of serum with cardiolipin-liposome/beta(2)-GPI or phosphatidyl
serine-liposome/prothrombin gave little evidence of cross-reactivity o
f aPA and AECA. The results of our study suggest that aPA and AECA may
have partially cross-reacted, but were different antibodies. However,
further study is needed to clarify the clinico-pathological significa
nce of AECA.