Object. The authors reviewed and analyzed information on 74 patients w
ith split spinal cord malformations (SSCMs) treated between January 1,
1980 and December 31, 1996 at their institution with the aim of defin
ing and classifying the malformations according to the method of Pang,
et al. Methods. Computerized tomography myelography was superior to o
ther radiological tools in defining the type of SSCM. There were 46 gi
rls (62%) and 28 boys (38%) ranging in age from less than 1 day to 12
years (mean 33.08 months). The mean age (43.2 months) of the patients
who exhibited neurological deficits and orthopedic deformities was sig
nificantly older than those (8.2 months) without deficits (p = 0.003).
Fifty-two patients had a single Type I and 18 patients a single Type
II SSCM; four patients had composite SSCMs. Sixty-two patients had at
least one associated spinal lesion that could lead to spinal cord teth
ering. After surgery, the majority of the patients remained stable and
clinical improvement was observed in 18 patients. Conclusions. The cl
assification of SSCMs proposed by Pang, et al., will eliminate the cur
rent chaos in terminology. In all SSCMs, either a rigid or a fibrous s
eptum was found to transfix the spinal cord. There was at least one un
related lesion that caused tethering of the spinal cord in 85% of the
patients. The risk of neurological deficits resulting from SSCMs incre
ases with the age of the patient; therefore, all patients should be su
rgically treated when diagnosed, especially before the development of
orthopedic and neurological manifestations.