Several authors have documented the poor performance of usual large-sa
mple, individual calibration confidence intervals based on a single ru
n of an immunoassay. Inaccuracy of these intervals may be attributed t
o the paucity of information on model parameters available in a single
run. Methods for combining information from multiple runs to estimate
assay response variance parameters and to refine characterization of
the standard curve for the current run via empirical Bayes techniques
have been proposed. We investigate formally the utility of these techn
iques for improving the quality of routine individual calibration infe
rence.