The molecular events of odontogenic induction are beginning to be eluc
idated, but until now nothing was known about the molecular basis of t
he patterning of the dentition. A role for Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 genes in pa
tterning of the dentition has been proposed with the genes envisaged a
s participating in an 'odontogenic homeobox gene code' by specifying m
olar development, This proposal was based on the restricted expression
of the genes in molar ectomesenchyme derived from cranial neural cres
t cells prior to tooth initiation. Mice with targeted null mutations o
f both Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 homeobox genes do not develop maxillary molar t
eeth but incisors and mandibular molars are normal, We have carried ou
t heterologous recombinations between mutant and wild-type maxillary e
pithelium and mesenchyme and show that the ectomesenchyme underlying t
he maxillary molar epithelium has lost its odontogenic potential, Usin
g molecular markers of branchial arch neural crest (Barx1) and commitm
ent to chondrogenic differentiation (Sax9), we show that this populati
on alters its fate from odontogenic to become chondrogenic, These resu
lts provide evidence that a subpopulation of cranial neural crest is s
pecified as odontogenic by Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 genes, Loss of function of
these genes results in reprogramming of this population of ectomesench
yme cells into chondrocytes. This is the first indication that the dev
elopment of different shaped teeth at different positions in the jaws
is determined by independent genetic pathways.