The palaeomagnetic directions of seven Dutch fireplaces are compared w
ith the archaeological age estimates which range from the first to the
17(th) century AD. A comparison with the British master curve of secu
lar variation for archaeomagnetic dating results in a refinement of th
e archaeological age estimates in two cases, while four other archaeol
ogical age estimates can be confirmed. For one fireplace only one samp
le is reliable, resulting in a very poorly defined archaeomagnetic age
of 2 to 3 centuries younger than the expected age (i.e. late Middle A
ges). On the other hand,; accepting the archaeological age estimates,
the palaeomagnetic directions can contribute to the database that is u
sed to construct the British secular-variation master curve. We applie
d the classification grades proposed by Tarling & Dobson (1995) which
range from unreliable (grade 1) to reliable (grade 5). Three fireplace
s have grades 5, one has grade 4, one grade 3, one grade 1 and for one
case no grade was assigned.