THE STUDY AND REPORT BY THE BENTON FOUNDATION relies heavily on inform
ation supplied by the general public, which has already shown in previ
ous contacts its total inability to select among alternatives, to rank
order, and to relate desires to funding options. This information is
then compared to recommendations made by representatives of organizati
ons identified as library ''leaders.'' However, the report confuses le
adership with management authority and ignores the fact that managers
and leaders have different and frequently contradictory priorities. Fi
nally, this article argues that any meaningful strategy must come dire
ctly from the analysis and professional judgment of librarians unfette
red by what outsiders might consider desirable or reasonable, and sugg
ests ways in which such a strategy might be developed.