The paper analyses the use of community conferencing for young people
in various jurisdictions in Australia in the light of its impact in in
digenous communities. It argues that the manner in which these program
s have been introduced has ignored Aboriginal rights to self-determina
tion and has grossly simplified Indigenous mechanisms for resolving co
nflicts. in most jurisdictions, community conferencing has reinforced
the role of state police and done little to ensure greater control ove
r police discretionary decision-making. The changes have also been int
roduced in the context of more punitive law and order policies, includ
ing mandatory minimum imprisonment terms and repeat offender legislati
on for juveniles. The end result is likely to be greater bifurcation o
f the juvenile justice system along racialised boundaries, with indige
nous youth receiving more punitive outcomes.