CHARACTERIZATION OF ENDOCRINE EVENTS DURING THE PERIESTROUS PERIOD INSHEEP AFTER ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION WITH CONTROLLED INTERNAL-DRUG RELEASE (CIDR) DEVICE
J. Vancleeff et al., CHARACTERIZATION OF ENDOCRINE EVENTS DURING THE PERIESTROUS PERIOD INSHEEP AFTER ESTROUS SYNCHRONIZATION WITH CONTROLLED INTERNAL-DRUG RELEASE (CIDR) DEVICE, Domestic animal endocrinology, 15(1), 1998, pp. 23-34
The Controlled Internal Drug Releasing (CIDR) device is an intravagina
l pessary containing progesterone (P-4) designed for synchronizing est
rus in ruminants. To date, there has been little information available
on the timing, duration, and quality of the follicular phase after CI
DR removal and how those characteristics compare with natural periovul
atory endocrine events. The present communication relates the results
of methods we used to characterize the endocrine events that followed
CIDR synchronization. Breeding-season ewes were given an injection (10
mg) of Lutalyse (PGF(2 alpha),), and then studied during three consec
utive estrous cycles, beginning in the luteal phase after the estrus i
nduced by PGF(2 alpha),. Cycle 1 estrus was synchronized with 1 CIDR (
Type G) inserted for 8 d beginning 10 d after PGF(2 alpha). Cycles 2 a
nd 3 were synchronized with two CIDRs for 8 d beginning 10 d after pre
vious CIDR removal. Cycle 1 estrous behavior and serum gonadotropins s
howed a follicular phase (the interval from CIDR withdrawal to gonadot
ropin surge [surge] peak) of 38.2 +/- 1.5 hr. Two CIDRs lengthened the
interval to 46.2 +/- 1.5 hr (P < 0.0001). At CIDR removal, circulatin
g P-4 concentrations were higher in ewes treated with two CIDRs (5.1 /- 0.3 and 6.4 +/- 0.4 ng/mL in Cycles 2 and 3 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.3 ng/mL i
n Cycle 1), whereas estradiol concentrations were higher in the 1 CIDR
cycle (3.3 +/- 0.5 pg/mL in Cycle 1 vs. 0.5 +/- 0.1, and 0.7 +/- 0.2
pg/mL in Cycles 2 and 3), suggesting that the lower levels of P-4 achi
eved with one CIDR was not sufficient to arrest follicular development
. There were no differences in any other endocrine variable. Both one
and two CIDR synchronization concentrated surges within a 24-hr period
in 92% of the ewes in Cycles 1 and 2. Cycle 3 ewes were euthanized at
estimated luteal, early follicular, late follicular, LH surge, and se
condary FSH rise timepoints. Endocrine data and ovaries showed that 88
% of the ewes synchronized with two CIDRs were in the predicted stage
of the estrous cycle. These data demonstrate that the CIDR device appl
ied during the luteal phase effectively synchronizes estrus and result
s in a CIDR removal-to-surge interval of similar length to a natural f
ollicular phase. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 1998.