M. Chaturvedi et al., EFFECT OF LISINOPRIL ON PROGRESSION OF RETINOPATHY IN NORMOTENSIVE PEOPLE WITH TYPE-1 DIABETES, Lancet, 351(9095), 1998, pp. 28-31
Background Retinopathy commonly occurs in people with type 1 diabetes.
Strict glycaemic control can decrease development and progression of
retinopathy only partially. Blood pressure is also a risk factor for m
icrovascular complications. Antihypertensive therapy, especially with
inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), can slow progressio
n of nephropathy, but the effects on retinopathy have not been establi
shed. We investigated the effect of lisinopril on retinopathy in type
1 diabetes. Methods As part of a 2-year randomised double-blind placeb
o-controlled trial, we took retinal photographs at baseline and follow
-up (24 months) in patients aged 20-59 in 15 European centres. Patient
s were not hypertensive, and were normoalbuminuric (85%) or microalbum
inuric. Retinopathy was classified from photographs on a five-fever sc
ale (none to proliferative). Findings The proportion of patients with
retinopathy at baseline was 65% (117) in the placebo group and 59% (10
3) in the lisinopril group (p=0.2). Patients on lisinopril had signifi
cantly lower HbA(1c) at baseline than those on placebo (6.9% vs 7.3 p=
0.05). Retinopathy progressed by at least one level in 21 (13.2%) of 1
59 patients on lisinopril and 39 (23.4%) of 166 patients on placebo (o
dds ratio 0.50 [95% CI 0.28-0.89], p=0.02). This 50% reduction was the
same when adjusted for centre and glycaemic control (0.55 [0.30-1.03]
, p=0.06). Lisinopril also decreased progression by two or move grades
(0.27 [0.07-1.00], p=0.05), and progression to proliferative retinopa
thy (0.18 [0.04-0.82], p=0.03). Progression was not associated with al
buminuric status at baseline. Treatment reduced retinopathy incidence
(0.69 [0.30-1.59], p=0.4). Interpretation Lisinopril may decrease reti
nopathy progression in non-hypertensive patients who have type 1 diabe
tes with little or no nephropathy. These findings need to be confirmed
before changes to clinical practice can be advocated.