In this paper, redistribution is studied in the presence of migration
externalities. Administrative federalism is defined as a constitution
where statutory tax and transfer levels are set nationally, while loca
l administrations may refuse to pay the transfer or rebate the tax in
single cases, thereby introducing horizontal inequity. With risk avers
ion, this is less attractive than reducing the level of redistribution
in a horizontally equal way. It is shown that administrative federali
sm leads to higher transfers and higher utilitarian welfare than decen
tralized decisions, that it may implement the first-best solution, and
that horizontal inequity never occurs in equilibrium.