We evaluated the use of utility measurements to assess the quality of
life of patients with Crohn's disease. Utility scores were obtained us
ing the Time Trade-Off (TTO), Standard Gamble, and Visual Analog Scale
(VAS) methods in 180 consecutive patients with Crohn's disease. The m
ean utility scores of patients with a spectrum of disease severity wer
e compared with other measures of disease activity to assess the opera
ting properties of these instruments. All methods of utility estimatio
n yielded lower mean scores in patients with more severe disease. (Rem
ission versus chronically active? therapy resistant disease: TTO 0.96
versus 0.88; Standard Gamble 0.88 versus 0.74; VAS 0.84 versus 0.61).
TTO scores were consistently higher than those derived by the other me
thods (p = 0.001). The utility scores were reliable in patients who we
re stable (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.55-0.54), but were les
s responsive than the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (responsiveness r
atio 0.97-1.3 versus 2.10) to changes in disease severity. Patients wi
th active Crohn's disease have decreased quality of life as measured b
y utility scores. Although utilities are valid and reliable quality of
life assessments, they are less responsive than other measures of out
come used for clinical trials.