Pr. Camfield et al., IF A FIRST ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG FAILS TO CONTROL A CHILDS EPILEPSY, WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF SUCCESS WITH THE NEXT DRUG, The Journal of pediatrics, 131(6), 1997, pp. 821-824
Objective: This study was carried out to determine how often a child's
epilepsy is controlled and remits if a first antiepileptic drug (AED)
fails to control seizures. Study design: We used the Nova Scotia popu
lation-based epilepsy study, which identified children between 1977 an
d 1985 who had two or more unprovoked seizures without progressive cau
se and followed them up for at least 4 years. Seizure types were parti
al, primary, and secondarily generalized (excluding absence seizures).
The study documented success or failure of the initial AED in the fir
st year of treatment, as well as long-term seizure control and remissi
on. Results: The number of eligible children was 417, with an average
follow-up period of 8 years. The initial prescribed AEDs were phenobar
bital (48%), carbamazepine (38%), and phenytoin (11%). Overall, 345 (8
3%) children received only one AED in the first year of treatment; 61%
became free of seizures and no longer required AED treatment at the e
nd of follow-up (remission). Only 4% of those treated with a single AE
D during the first year later experienced intractable epilepsy. In con
trast, 72 of 417 (17%) had inadequate seizure control with their first
AED and received a second AED, with only 42% having complete remissio
n of their epilepsy. The 72 children in whom seizures were not control
led with the first AED were more likely to have neurologic deficits (p
= 0.01) and complex partial seizures (p = 0.01), and 29% had intracta
ble epilepsy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: If the first AED is not effica
cious, the outcome is less favorable, although many children will have
remission of their epilepsy. Invasive or complex treatments for epile
psy with partial and generalized tonic-clonic seizures should not be u
sed until at least two AEDs have failed to control seizures.