Tnk. Raju et al., VITAMIN-E PROPHYLAXIS TO REDUCE RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY - A REAPPRAISAL OF PUBLISHED TRIALS, The Journal of pediatrics, 131(6), 1997, pp. 844-850
Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis of the published randomized cl
inical trials of vitamin E prophylaxis designed to reduce retinopathy
of prematurity (ROP) to determine whether increased serum concentratio
ns of vitamin E reduced the incidence of severe, threshold (Stage 3+)
ROP in the very low birth weight (VLBW) infant subset. Study Design: A
mong the six trials considered eligible for analyses, the incidence fo
r all stages of ROP and for Stage 3+ ROP was computed for all randomly
assigned infants (intention-to-treat analysis) and for those infants
completing the trials. Odds ratios (ORs) and pooled estimates for even
t rate reductions (and the respective 95% confidence intervals [Cls])
were calculated for these outcome end points. Results: There were 704
VLBW infants in the vitamin E prophylaxis groups and 714 in control gr
oups; 536 (76.1%) infants in the vitamin E and 551 (77.2%) in the cont
rol groups completed the trials. In all trials the mean serum vitamin
E concentrations were within or above the physiologic range in the vit
amin-treated groups and at or below the physiologic ranges in the cont
rol groups. The overall incidence of any stage ROP was similar between
the groups: 39.8% in the vitamin E group and 43.5% in the control gro
up. The overall incidence for Stage 3+ ROP was lower in the vitamin E-
treated groups than in the control group (2.4% in vitamin E vs 5.3% in
control). The pooled OR for developing Stage 3+ ROP with vitamin E pr
ophylaxis was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21, 0.81, p < 0.02). The reciprocal of t
he pooled estimate of mean risk reduction (2.8%, 95% CI: 0.55%, 5.1%)
for Stage 3+ ROP revealed that on average, vitamin E prophylaxis given
to 35 VLBW infants would prevent one case of threshold, Stage 3+ ROP.
Conclusions: Considering that there was a 52% reduction in the incide
nce of Stage 3+ ROP, we suggest that the role of vitamin E in reducing
severe ROP be re-evaluated. We could not assess the adverse effect ra
tes from vitamin E therapy in the trials analyzed; therefore, we recom
mend a well-controlled and focused trial in which the issues Of benefi
t, adverse effects, and cost can be assessed with vitamin E prophylaxi
s in extremely low birth weight (< 1000 gm) infants.