P. Ausiello et al., FRACTURE-RESISTANCE OF ENDODONTICALLY-TREATED PREMOLARS ADHESIVELY RESTORED, American journal of dentistry, 10(5), 1997, pp. 237-241
Purpose: To investigate the cusp fracture resistance of endodontically
treated teeth, adhesively restored with various materials. Materials
and Methods: MOD preparations and endodontic treatment was carried out
on extracted sound maxillary premolars. The cavities were restored wi
th the amalgam Valiant in combination with Superbond or Panavia bondin
g, the resin composites Z100, Herculite XRV or Clearfil RP with their
respective bonding systems, Z100 in combination with the glass ionomer
s Ketac Fil, Fuji II and Vitremer, and Tetric in combination with Comp
oglass. Fracture resistance was measured by axial loading in an Instro
n testing machine. Results: One of the restorative methods, resin comp
osites in combination with dentin bonding systems in beveled MOD prepa
rations rendered the tooth a cusp fracture resistance which did not di
ffer significantly from that of sound natural teeth. Two other restora
tive methods, bonded amalgam and a sandwich of glass ionomer cement /r
esin composite in beveled preparations were significantly weaker in re
sisting cusp fracture than sound natural teeth, but still significantl
y stronger than the unrestored tooth with a MOD preparation. It was st
atistically apparent that several adhesive restorative systems could s
atisfactorily be used to restore teeth after endodontic therapy.