The seismic cycle requires that faults strengthen (heal) between earth
quakes, and the rate of this healing process plays a key role in deter
mining earthquake stress drop(1-4), rupture characteristics(5,6) and s
eismic scaling relations(2-4,7). Frictional healing (as evidenced by i
ncreasing static friction during quasi-stationary contact between two
surfaces(1,8-12)) is considered the mechanism most likely to be respon
sible for fault strengthening(2,3,13,14). Previous studies, however, h
ave shown a large discrepancy between laboratory and seismic (field) e
stimates of the healing rate(2-4,14,15); in the laboratory, rock frict
ion changes by only a few per cent per order-of-magnitude change in sl
ip rate, whereas seismic stress drop increases by a factor of 2 to 5 p
er order-of-magnitude increase in earthquake recurrence interval, But
in such comparisons, it is assumed that healing and static friction ar
e independent of loading rate, Here, I summarize laboratory measuremen
ts showing that static friction and healing vary with loading rate and
time, as expected from friction theory(16-18). Applying these results
to seismic faulting and accounting for differences in laboratory, sei
smic and tectonic slip rates, I demonstrate that post-seismic healing
is expected to be retarded for a period of several hundred days follow
ing an earthquake, in agreement with recent findings from repeating ea
rthquakes(13,14,19,20).