DIFFERENT ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STRUCTURAL DOMAINS ARE REQUIRED FOR ESTROGEN-DEPENDENT AND TAMOXIFEN-DEPENDENT ANTIPROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY IN HUMAN MAMMARY EPITHELIAL-CELLS EXPRESSING AN EXOGENOUS ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR

Citation
Da. Zajchowski et al., DIFFERENT ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STRUCTURAL DOMAINS ARE REQUIRED FOR ESTROGEN-DEPENDENT AND TAMOXIFEN-DEPENDENT ANTIPROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY IN HUMAN MAMMARY EPITHELIAL-CELLS EXPRESSING AN EXOGENOUS ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR, Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 62(5-6), 1997, pp. 373-383
Citations number
49
ISSN journal
09600760
Volume
62
Issue
5-6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
373 - 383
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-0760(1997)62:5-6<373:DESDAR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Estrogen (E) inhibits the growth of both non-tumorigenic, immortal hum an mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) and breast cancer cells which stabl y express exogenous estrogen receptors (ER). The anti-estrogenic compo unds 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (HT) and ICI 164384 (ICI) have different effe cts on the growth of the ER-transfectants. HT is a potent growth inhib itor, while ICI has no effect by itself but is able to block the anti- proliferative effects of E and HT. In order to elucidate the mechanism by which E or HT-bound ER inhibit cell growth, we have evaluated the effects of these compounds on the growth of HMEC stably expressing ER with mutations or deletions in the N-terminal A/B domain, the DNA-bind ing domain (DBD), and the C-terminal ligand-binding domain. These stud ies revealed that E and HT require different structural domains of the ER for their anti-proliferative activities. The N-terminal APS domain is required for HT-, but not E-dependent growth inhibition. The DNA-b inding domain of the ER is not essential for HT-mediated anti-prolifer ative effects, but is important for E-dependent activity. The effect o f ER mutations on the ligand-inducible expression of the endogenous pr ogesterone receptor (PR) and pS2 genes was also evaluated. Neither gen e was induced in the cells containing the ER mutated in the DBD, even though cell growth was inhibited. These results suggest that E and HT use different pathways to elicit their anti-proliferative effects and that this occurs via modulation of genes that are controlled by mechan isms different from those important for activation of the PR and pS2 g enes. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.