Mv. Lopezcalleja et al., EFFECTS OF SUGAR CONCENTRATION ON HUMMINGBIRD FEEDING AND ENERGY USE, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 118(4), 1997, pp. 1291-1299
We investigated the effect of sucrose concentration on the patterns of
feeding, gut function, and energy management in the nectar-eating Chi
lean hummingbird Sephanoides sephanoides. We interpreted these results
using a simple model of digestive function. The predictions of this m
odel are: (a) Hummingbirds should exhibit 100% assimilation efficiency
of sugars at all sugar concentrations; (b) Daily rates of energy inta
ke should be positively correlated with sugar concentration; and (c) I
ncreased sugar concentration should lead to linearly increasing meal r
etention times, and, therefore, to linearly increasing time intervals
between meals. In agreement with the model, hummingbirds exhibited alm
ost complete assimilation of sugars and increased meal retention times
and intermeal intervals with increased sugar concentration. Hummingbi
rds did not, however, show any significant differences in daily energy
intake when fed different sugar concentrations. Birds differed in the
ir temporal pattern of feeding when fed solutions with sucrose solutio
ns of contrasting concentrations. At low food sucrose concentrations (
0.25 M), birds showed a burst of feeding before dark. In contrast, bir
ds feeding on higher sucrose concentrations (0.5 M and 0.75 M) showed
steadily declining feeding activity throughout the day. In addition to
measuring the behavior and gut function of hummingbirds, we also meas
ured their daily patterns of energy use using respirometry. Hummingbir
ds showed considerable flexibility in their patterns of energy use. Th
e amount of energy used at night was positively correlated with the su
rplus of energy (intake minus diurnal expenditures) at dusk. Although
birds exhibited only small variation in total daily energy budgets as
a function of sugar concentration, birds feeding at the lowest sucrose
concentration (0.25 M) seemed to rely on nocturnal torpor with more f
requency than those fed on higher concentrations. We conclude that ene
rgy maximization is probably an inappropriate assumption for birds tha
t are not growing, storing fat, or reproducing. We present a modificat
ion of the original model that allows assuming that birds do not maxim
ize energy intake, but rather maintain constant rates of energy intake
. We describe experiments and criteria that allow discriminating among
the two models. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.