S. Desmarais et K. Curtis, GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PAY HISTORIES AND VIEWS ON PAY ENTITLEMENT AMONG UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS, Sex roles, 37(9-10), 1997, pp. 623-642
Experimental research with college students has shown that women repor
t lower entitlement to pay than men for the same tasks and conditions.
Gender differences in past socialization, which have resulted in diff
erent social psychological orientations by gender are the commonly off
ered explanations for this pattern of results. We examine the possibil
ity that gender differences in recent pay experience influence entitle
ment views by providing different standards for female and male studen
ts' judgments of their entitlements. Through a survey of female and ma
le undergraduates in psychology courses labour 95% were Caucasians), w
e assessed respondents' incomes and perceptions of deserved income, fo
r past and current work, and expectations and entitlements for future
wages after graduation. Before controls, women reported deserving sign
ificantly less than did men for jobs last summer and for future jobs.
Women also had earned less than men from jobs last summer. Few student
s were currently working during the school year and there were nor sig
nificant gender differences in income fr om current work. After contro
ls for level of earnings from the job held last summer there was no lo
nger a statistically significant gender difference in perceived entitl
ement. The gender gap in pay that is so pervasive among working adults
also extends to the experiences of women and men in their college yea
rs who have not yet entered full-time, full-year work, and this gap is
related to gender differences in perceptions of pay entitlement, Alte
rnative interpretations are discussed.